NAAA calls for loopholes to be removed from liquor laws so that families and communities are safe from alcohol-fuelled harm

The National Alliance for Action on Alcohol (NAAA) is calling on the NSW Parliament to close loopholes around online sales and delivery of alcohol so that families and communities can be kept safe from alcohol-fuelled harm at home.

NAAA Co-Chair Dr John Crozier said the NSW Parliament has the opportunity to reduce alcohol-fuelled harms by requiring ID checks when alcohol is sold online and by stopping companies from rapidly delivering alcohol to people.

“Right now, a person’s age does not need to be checked when they buy alcohol online and companies can rapidly deliver alcohol to intoxicated people,” said Dr Crozier.

“Vulnerable people, particularly children and families, are likely to be harmed by businesses rapidly delivering alcohol products to homes late at night.”

Dr Crozier said that the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the dangers of online sales and delivery of alcohol products.

“Since March, levels of alcohol-fuelled harm, such as domestic violence and risky drinking, have risen. At the same time, online sales and delivery of alcohol products have increased significantly.”

“We know that the risk of alcohol-fuelled harms, such as suicide and family violence are more likely to occur in the home late at night.”

The NAAA is calling for changes to the Liquor Amendment Bill 2020 so that families and communities can be kept safe from alcohol-fuelled harms. This can be done by:

  • Amending the cut-off-times for alcohol delivery, so that latest delivery is 9pm instead of midnight, and earliest delivery is midday instead of 5am. This is due to the known risk of greater alcohol harms in the home later at night, such as suicide and family violence.
  • Introducing a delay of two hours between order and delivery. Evidence shows delivery within 2 hours is associated with risky alcohol use. A delivery delay will reduce the risk of alcohol supply to people who are intoxicated, which will also increase the personal safety for delivery agents.
  • Extending the offence to supply alcohol to a person who is intoxicated to all deliveries, not just same day delivery. Alcohol supply to an intoxicated person should be an offence regardless of how long a delivery takes.
  • Reintroducing the requirement to verify age at point of sale to prevent alcohol being sold to children, and extend it to all alcohol deliveries, not just same day delivery.

NAAA applauds Ministers for ensuring that a clear, visible and honest health warning appears on alcohol products

The National Alliance for Action on Alcohol (NAAA) congratulates Ministers on the Australia and New Zealand Ministerial Forum on Food Regulation for mandating an effective health warning label on alcohol products to discourage alcohol consumption during pregnancy.

NAAA Co-Chair Jane Martin said, “We congratulate Ministers for approving what the evidence shows to be the most effective pregnancy warning label. In doing so, they have played their part in delivering a responsible reform that will reduce the number of children with Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD) and puts the health of babies ahead of the commercial interests of alcohol companies.

“The label incorporates an eye-catching combination of red, white and black and uses the words ‘Pregnancy Warning’ sending a strong message to the community that alcohol use in pregnancy causes harm.

“The fact is, there is no safe level of alcohol use in pregnancy. Alcohol is the only cause of FASD (Fetal Alcohol Syndrome Disorder), a devastating, lifelong disability for which there is no cure. It also causes miscarriage, stillbirth, premature birth, birth defects and developmental problems.

“Despite this, alcohol companies have not been required to place a standard health warning on all products. The decision to mandate an effective label ensures people have access to clear information about the effect alcohol can have on unborn babies from July 2023. Recent polling shows that 95 per cent of Australians agree that people have a right to know that drinking alcohol whilst pregnant can cause lifelong harm to an unborn baby.”

The decision has strong support, with the visible health warning campaign supported by 165 organisations and 4,000 community advocates and leaders.

NAAA calls on Ministers to vote for a clear, visible and honest health warning on alcohol products this Friday

The National Alliance for Action on Alcohol (NAAA) is calling on Ministers on the Australia and New Zealand Ministerial Forum on Food Regulation to put the health and wellbeing of children first by approving the most effective pregnancy health warning label on alcohol products when they meet on Friday.

NAAA commends Foods Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ) for recommending that a pregnancy health warning label with three colours – red, black and white – as being the most effective and urges Ministers to vote for this label.

The alcohol industry continues to aggressively resist the introduction of effective pregnancy health warning labels on alcohol products.

NAAA Co-Chair Jane Martin said, “Watering down the warning colours from red, black and white would make the warning virtually invisible.”

“Yet again we are seeing the alcohol industry is placing commercial interests ahead of the health and wellbeing of our children by actively campaigning for a weakened pregnancy warning label.”

“We are also disappointed that FSANZ has amended the label’s signal wording from ‘Health Warning’ to ‘Pregnancy Warning’ as this narrows the audience.

“Alcohol is the only cause of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD). This is a devastating, lifelong condition that can be prevented when women are aware of the risks of drinking while pregnant, and supported by their families, friends and the broader community to have alcohol free pregnancies.”

FSANZ conservatively estimated the health-related cost of FASD across Australia and New Zealand to be A$27.6 billion over 20 years. Just over 1 per cent of FASD cases need to be prevented to offset the total cost of label changes.

“Half of all pregnancies in Australia are unplanned, making the risk of alcohol exposure very high; yet a quarter of Australians don’t know that drinking during pregnancy is harmful.

“FASD is the leading cause of preventable developmental disability in Australia. The alcohol industry does not want a clear and effective health warning label because it does not want people to know about the real risks of alcohol use during pregnancy.”

NAAA welcomes alcohol harm reductions in Northern Territory thanks to minimum unit price on alcohol

The National Alliance for Action on Alcohol (NAAA) has joined other public health groups today calling for other Australian jurisdictions to follow the lead of the Northern Territory Government and introduce a minimum unit price on alcohol to support the health of their communities.

An independent report released today shows that the implementation of a minimum unit price on alcohol in the Territory has been associated with significant reductions in alcohol-related assaults, ambulance attendances, emergency department presentations, road traffic crashes and child protection notifications.

NAAA Co-Chair Jane Martin has welcomed these important reductions in harm for the Northern Territory community.

“Alcohol related harm has had a devastating impact on Northern Territory communities, with the Territory experiencing the highest rate of alcohol-fuelled hospitalisations and deaths.”

“Minimum Unit pricing, along with other harm reduction initiatives in the Northern Territory, is helping to build healthier and safer communities.”

Since a minimum unit price on alcohol was introduced in the Northern Territory in October 2018, a standard alcoholic drink cannot be legally sold for less than $1.30.

“The Northern Territory government should be congratulated on its leadership and commitment to improving the lives of its citizens,” Ms Martin said.

The NAAA is now urging all states and territories to introduce a minimum unit price on alcohol, as part of a comprehensive suite of alcohol harm-reduction measures.

– ENDS –

National Alliance for Action on Alcohol Co-Chair Jane Martin (Cancer Council Victoria) is available for interview.

Media contact: Kim Loudon, 0452 161 986, kim.loudon@cancervic.org.au

About the National Alliance for Action on Alcohol:

The National Alliance for Action on Alcohol (NAAA) is a national coalition representing more than 20 organisations from across Australia. NAAA’s members cover a diverse range of interests, including public health, law enforcement, local government, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health, child and adolescent health, and family and community services.

www.actiononalcohol.org.au             Twitter: @ACTIONonALCOHOL

Media Release

 

NAAA Welcomes Queensland Government move to protect children from alcohol advertising

The National Alliance for Action on Alcohol (NAAA) welcomes the announcement from the Queensland Government that alcohol and unhealthy food advertising will be banned from Government owned property.

Queensland now joins the Australia Capital Territory (ACT), Victoria and Western Australia (WA) in moving to protect children from alcohol industry advertising. The removal of alcohol advertising from Government owned property will commence with the Queensland’s rail network and be extended to busways, bus shelters, roadsides, and outside major hospitals.

NAAA Co-Chair Dr John Crozier congratulated the Queensland Government for protecting children, “We know that greater exposure to alcohol advertising results in children being more likely to drink alcohol at a younger age and at riskier levels. The Queensland Government should be congratulated for taking this important step to remove alcohol advertising from Government owned property and reduce children’s exposure to alcohol advertising.”

This move from the Queensland Government demonstrates their continued leadership in preventing and reducing the harms caused by alcoholic products, as Queensland is the only state or territory in the country to have state-wide late-night trading limits for licensed venues.

Just last month the Queensland Government was ranked second in the NAAA Alcohol Policy Scorecard for its ongoing commitment to reducing the harms from alcohol.

“The Queensland Government has again demonstrated leadership in taking evidence-based and decisive action to reduce the harm from alcohol and improve the health and wellbeing of Queenslanders.” Dr Crozier said

National Alliance for Action on Alcohol Co-Chair Dr John Crozier (Royal Australasian College of Surgeons) is available for interview.

Media contact: Caterina Giorgi, 040 272 6002, caterina@forpurpose.com.au

Media Release

 

Northern Territory wins award for most action taken on alcohol in 2018, while New South Wales takes out the Fizzer

14 MARCH 2019

The Northern Territory (NT) has won the award for the most action taken on alcohol in 2018 against all other Australian states and territories, while New South Wales (NSW) has taken the Fizzer for the worst performer.

‘The Fizzers’ is an initiative of the National Alliance for Action on Alcohol (NAAA) that compares progress in alcohol policy development annually between Australian states and territories. The Fizzers are scored by three expert assessors in each state and territory.

The NT won the award for the best performer for their comprehensive alcohol policy reform following their response to the landmark Riley Review into alcohol policies and legislation.

NAAA Co-Chair Ms Jane Martin said “The Northern Territory Government is taking action to introduce a range of alcohol policies that will save lives and keep people healthy and well. Their comprehensive reform agenda is leaving no stone unturned and they have also committed to evaluating these measures to contribute to further evidence-based policy development. They are very worthy winners of the best performer in the Alcohol Policy Scorecard.”

Across 2018 the NT Government has undertaken extensive work to implement alcohol policy and program changes arising from the Alcohol Policies and Legislation Review (The Riley Review). In February 2018 the NT Government responded to the Riley Review supporting all but one of the 220 recommendations. The NT Government has made substantial progress in introducing these recommendations with more than 50 already implemented.

At the other end of the scale, NSW has won the Fizzer for the worst performing state or territory in 2018. The NSW Government received the Fizzer because it does not have an alcohol strategy in place, it failed to introduce several recommendations arising from a review into alcohol advertising and there is concern about the level of alcohol industry influence in the states alcohol policies. NSW was one of three jurisdictions who did not receive a pass mark, alongside Tasmania and the Australian Capital Territory (ACT).

NAAA Co-Chair Dr John Crozier said “The NSW Government is eroding the safeguards that exist to keep the community safe. This undermining of these key policies is in part due to the strong influence of the alcohol industry in this state.”

Across the country there were notable actions being taken in several states and territories including the introduction of restrictions on advertising of alcohol on public transport in Western Australia and Victoria and the ongoing commitment to trading hour restrictions and a comprehensive evaluation across the state in Queensland.

NAAA Co-Chair Jane Martin said “Across the country we have seen a number of states and territories introduce measures that demonstrate a commitment to the health of Australians, with five out of eight states receiving a pass mark. When the health of Australians is prioritised ahead of the interests of the alcohol industry, we all benefit.”

SUMMARY OF 2018 ALCOHOL POLICY SCORECARD APPROACH AND FINDINGS

The Alcohol Policy Scorecard (the Scorecard) is an initiative of the National Alliance for Action on Alcohol (NAAA) and aims to raise awareness of progress in alcohol policy development, recognise good practice in alcohol policy, and motivate governments to improve alcohol policy.

This is NAAA’s fifth Alcohol Policy Scorecard and provides detailed results of state and territory alcohol policy actions from 2018. The Scorecard rates states and territories on nine criteria on their overall performance for policy implementation in 2018. A Fizzer Award is given to the worst performer and an award is given to the best performer. Both of these categories are assessed on a five-point scale by three separate alcohol policy experts in each state and territory. 

NT WA QLD VIC SA ACT TAS NSW
Performance in 2018 1 2 2 4 5 6 7 8
68% 56% 56% 53% 50% 48% 32% 28%

National Alliance for Action on Alcohol Co-Chairs Dr John Crozier (Royal Australasian College of Surgeons) and Ms Jane Martin (Cancer Council Victoria) are available for interview.

Media contact: Caterina Giorgi, 040 272 6002, caterina@forpurpose.com.au  

Media release

2018 Alcohol Policy Scorecard

More funding for Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder

22 November 2018: The National Alliance for Action on Alcohol (NAAA) welcomes the Federal Government’s announcement on Wednesday of $7.2million in new funding for Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD).

The announcement coincides with the 2nd Australasian FASD Conference in Perth and follows the October announcement by the Australia and New Zealand Ministerial Forum on Food Regulation that government-developed pregnancy warning labels will be mandatory on all packaged alcoholic beverages.

FASD is the leading cause of preventable developmental disability in Australia. Alcohol consumption during pregnancy can lead to lifelong harm including miscarriage, still births, low birth weight and FASD.

“It’s good to see the Federal Government investing additional funding to FASD given its importance and preventability”, said NAAA Co-chair Jane Martin welcoming the announcement.

Anne Russell NAAA Executive Committee member and founder of the Russell Family Fetal Alcohol Disorders Association said “sixty percent of babies born in Australia are at risk for fetal alcohol spectrum disorder.  This statistic isn’t meant to cause consternation and anxiety, it’s a reality and it’s upsetting to think that so many children are at risk for this terrible condition,”

“As a parent to two children with FASD additional funding for education, diagnostic and support services and FASD resources will help prevent the occurrence of FASD and enhance the lives of children and their families with FASD.”

 

For further information/comment:

Jane Martin: 0418 358 768

Anne Russell: 0412 550 540

FASD Announcement Nov2018

Please click here for the PDF of the media release

 

Tasmania takes out Fizzer Award on national day of alcohol harm

26 January 2018

Tasmania has today received the 2017 annual Fizzer Award as the poorest performing jurisdiction, in a national alcohol policy scorecard released on Australia’s worst day for alcohol harm.

Scoring only 23 per cent when it comes to effective alcohol policy – closely followed by New South Wales at 24 per cent – the result highlights some clear opportunities for Tasmania and New South Wales to boost their efforts to address significant levels of alcohol harm in their communities.

Queensland has continued its performance as the state doing most to protect people from alcohol harm while the Northern Territory has shown the most improvement since last year.

The scorecard – produced by the National Alliance for Action on Alcohol (NAAA), a coalition of more than 40 health and community organisations – assesses the policies put in place by Australian governments to reduce harms caused by excessive alcohol consumption.

NAAA co-Chair Dr John Crozier said the absence of a state plan to reduce harms from alcohol and the Tasmanian Government’s close relationship with the state’s peak industry body for hotels, restaurants, cafes, pubs and clubs, were the reason for the jurisdiction’s low score.

“The Premier should know that attending an election event hosted by the Tasmanian Hospitality Association where free beer is being provided sends the wrong message to voters,” Dr Crozier said.

“New South Wales had the biggest slip in ranking after watering down its highly effective reduced trading hours in the Sydney CBD, threats to the world-leading Newcastle conditions and reducing the capacity of communities to object to licensing decisions.

“Alcohol consumption kills 5,500 Australians, hospitalises a further 157,000 each year and is a factor in a third of Australia’s fatal road crashes. We cannot afford to be complacent with policies to prevent dangerous drinking. Stronger evidence-based alcohol policy reforms must be implemented to promote public health and community safety.

“As a surgeon I see the damage first hand. Many of my colleagues will be treating a large number of drunk and injured people in emergency departments today. It’s normally around one in eight patients but today it will likely be more.”

NAAA co-Chair Ms Jane Martin said that Queensland’s state-wide introduction of 2am and 3am last drinks was a major step forward in the state’s efforts to limit dangerous drinking and injury caused by alcohol.

“We congratulate the Northern Territory Government for reintroducing the Banned Drinker Register and its commitment to adopt the recommendations of the Riley Review into alcohol, but more needs to be done to strengthen national and state alcohol policy,” Ms Martin said.

“The evidence about which policies keep people safe is clear. We aren’t waiting for medical breakthroughs to substantially reduce the health burden from alcohol. We’re just waiting for the political action.”

Indeed, all jurisdictions can do a lot better on alcohol policy, but where should they start? For some, the challenge is firstly to acknowledge that they have an alcohol problem in their backyard; and stop ignoring the evidence. It is time to put health and community safety before alcohol industry interests and begin introducing measures that have proven to be effective in reducing alcohol harm.

A copy of the scorecard is available on the NAAA website.

TO ARRANGE AN INTERVIEW WITH DR JOHN CROZIER OR MS JANE MARTIN PLEASE CONTACT:

Dr Devin Bowles – 0435 749 306

Please click here for the PDF of the media release which includes additional graphs ranking the states and territories.

 

About the National Alliance for Action on Alcohol:

The National Alliance for Action on Alcohol (NAAA) is a national coalition representing more than 40 organisations from across Australia. NAAA’s members cover a diverse range of interests, including public health, law enforcement, local government, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health, child and adolescent health, and family and community services.

NAAA’s National Alcohol Policy Scorecard aims to: raise awareness of progress in alcohol policy development within Australian states and territories; recognise good practice in alcohol policy; and motivate governments to continue to strengthen and improve alcohol policy.

www.actiononalcohol.org.au                 Twitter: @ACTIONonALCOHOL

 

Northern Territory paves the way for national alcohol reforms

The Public Health Association of Australia (PHAA) together with the National Alliance for Action on Alcohol (NAAA) commends the Northern Territory Government for undertaking its recently completed Alcohol Policies and Legislation Review aimed at preventing and minimising alcohol related harm in its communities.

The wide public consultation on the NT’s current alcohol policies and legislation initiated by the Review has enabled the gathering of important local data and recommendations. The NT Government has used the information to assess its current alcohol laws and identify key areas for reform.

David Templeman, President of the PHAA praised the Review, saying “The Review shows real courage in making recommendations based on the scientific evidence rather than in favour of the usual vested interests. The recommendation for a floor price on dangerously ‘cheap’ alcohol is absolutely in line with the scientific evidence on what works to reduce harm, and would be a first for Australia. A similar policy is currently being considered in WA.”

“The Northern Territory is now in a stronger position to analyse exactly where it can perform better in its regulation of alcohol. The Review is also significant in that better alcohol policy in the NT will have far-reaching effects beyond reducing the incidence of alcohol-related disease and death.”

Mr Templeman continued, “Through limiting alcohol misuse in these communities we will also see lowered health costs and increased productivity. We would also see lower incarceration rates, with reduced human and economic costs associated with imprisoning people.”

“Addressing the rivers of alcohol flowing into the Northern Territory is a step toward closing the gap in Indigenous health. For too long, Indigenous health has been disproportionately affected by ineffective alcohol policy,” Mr Templeman said.

“A whole-of-government approach to alcohol abuse is also likely to benefit the Territory in relation to the ongoing issue of child protection, since alcohol is closely linked to child welfare issues and high rates of domestic violence,” Mr Templeman said.

Julia Stafford, Executive Committee Member for the National Alliance for Action on Alcohol also supported the recommendations of the Review, saying “We applaud the Northern Territory for taking clear action to address alcohol harms. Given that the Territory’s population is so disproportionately affected by this issue compared to other jurisdictions, it’s appropriate that they are showing national leadership and are seriously looking at how to create better policy solutions.”

“We are highly supportive of the reforms suggested by the Review which will assist with developing an integrated Alcohol Harm Reduction Strategy. While some aspects to the reforms may not be welcomed by vested interests and a minority of the community, it’s important the Government persists and keeps the longer-term outcomes of improved health and wellbeing in mind,” Ms Stafford said.

For further information/comment:

David Templeman, President, Public Health Association of Australia 0414 265 122 davidtempleman1@live.com

Julia Stafford, Executive Committee Member for the National Alliance for Action on Alcohol 0413 531 398 j.stafford@curtin.edu.au

 

Please click here for the PDF of the media release.

New alcohol industry ad rules dismissed as window dressing

New alcohol industry ad rules dismissed as window dressing

20 July 2017

New advertising placement rules developed by the alcohol industry are unlikely to reduce young people’s exposure to alcohol promotion in any meaningful way, and highlight yet again the need for independent regulation of all forms of alcohol marketing to protect young people.

“There is a clear need for comprehensive controls on the content, placement and volume of alcohol marketing, but alcohol advertisers should not be the ones designing those controls”, said Julia Stafford, Executive Officer of the McCusker Centre for Action on Alcohol and Youth which runs the Alcohol Advertising Review Board.

“There are significant conflicts of interest at play – the Directors of the ABAC Scheme and the majority of its Management Committee represent the major brewers, distillers and winemakers in Australia. It’s no wonder the new ‘placement rules’ appear to be designed to look like the industry is addressing alcohol ad placement, without actually doing anything.

“We are not aware of any information about how these ‘placement rules’ can be expected to protect young people. We do not know how the provisions were developed, who was consulted, or if any data modelling was conducted to provide an evidence base for the rules”.

“The new placement provisions are incredibly generous to alcohol advertisers. For example, alcohol ads are allowed on television where at least 75% of the audience are adults. This approach hasn’t worked in other countries and it won’t work in Australia. Those aged under 18 years account for less than 25% of the Australian population and even a seemingly modest proportion of the TV audience can represent hundreds of thousands of young viewers.”

Michael Moore, co-chair of the National Alliance for Action on Alcohol (NAAA) said, “This is another sign that the alcohol industry is fearful of future independent regulation of alcohol marketing.

“The new ‘rules’ fail to address the significant gaps and weaknesses in the voluntary system – the ABAC Scheme still does not apply to alcohol sponsorship, there are few restrictions for outdoor media and the loophole allowing alcohol ads in weekend sport during children’s TV viewing times remains.

“These weak provisions should not deter the Australian Government from taking action to introduce effective alcohol marketing regulation that prioritises the health of young people”.

Please see New alcohol industry ad rules dismissed as window dressing_media release_200717 for the PDF of the media release.